High Wall Split Energy Efficiency Comparison
LVCC | KMCA / KMTA | KMCB / KMTB | KMTC | KMTD | KMTE

This article compares the rated energy efficiency of several generations of GENERAL / Fujitsu General reverse-cycle high wall split systems.

The comparison covers common 09, 12, 18, 22, 24, 30 and 34 capacity classes across the LVCC, KMCA/KMTA, KMCB/KMTB, KMTC, KMTD and KMTE ranges.

Quick answer: A newer model number does not automatically mean that every individual efficiency figure will be higher. Product development can change seasonal efficiency, operating range, capacity, refrigerant, controls and other characteristics. Always compare the complete matched indoor/outdoor system.

How is efficiency compared?

MeasureMeaning
EEREnergy Efficiency Ratio for cooling. Rated cooling output divided by rated electrical input. A higher number indicates greater rated cooling efficiency.
COPCoefficient of Performance for heating. Rated heating output divided by rated electrical input. A higher number indicates greater rated heating efficiency.
Important - star ratings: Older air conditioners may show a traditional cooling/heating star rating, while newer systems use the Zoned Energy Rating Label with separate Hot, Average and Cold climate ratings. These star-rating systems should not be directly compared as if they are the same test method. For historical comparisons, EER and COP provide a useful common rated-performance reference.

Model Naming Across the Ranges

Range / GenerationTypical ModelsNotes
LVCCASTG09LVCC through ASTG34LVCCEarlier Classic high wall range. Predominantly R410A.
KMCA / KMTAASTG09-24KMCA
ASTG30KMTA / ASTG34KMTA
Earlier R32 Lifestyle generation. 30 and 34 models use the KMTA suffix.
KMCB / KMTBASTG09-24KMCB
ASTG30KMTB / ASTG34KMTB
Later Lifestyle generation with Wi-Fi functionality. Rated EER/COP figures are generally unchanged from the equivalent KMCA/KMTA models.
KMTCASTG09KMTC through ASTG34KMTCLater Lifestyle range with updated seasonal performance and controls.
KMTDASTH18KMTD
ASTH22KMTD
ASTH24KMTD
ASTH30KMTD
ASTH34KMTD
Newer generation uses the ASTH indoor-unit prefix. 09 and 12 capacity models remain KMTC in the current Lifestyle family.
KMTEASTH24KMTE7.1 kW Lifestyle variant. Do not assume its rated-point EER/COP is identical to the KMTD or KMTC version.

EER / COP Comparison by Capacity

Figures below are shown as EER Cooling / COP Heating. Higher figures represent better efficiency at the rated test condition.

CapacityLVCCKMCA / KMTAKMCB / KMTBKMTCKMTD / KMTE
09
Approx. 2.5 kW
4.31 / 4.664.90 / 4.924.90 / 4.924.71 / 4.84-
12
Approx. 3.5 kW
3.80 / 4.324.07 / 4.574.07 / 4.573.93 / 4.68-
18
Approx. 5.0 kW
3.27 / 4.034.10 / 4.234.10 / 4.234.31 / 4.69KMTD
4.31 / 4.69
22
Approx. 6.0-6.3 kW
3.23 / 3.553.77 / 4.073.77 / 4.073.80 / 4.24KMTD
3.80 / 4.24
24
Approx. 7.1 kW
3.27 / 3.54*3.53 / 3.773.53 / 3.773.41 / 4.19KMTD: 3.41 / 4.19
KMTE: 3.23 / 3.92
30
Approx. 8.0-8.5 kW
3.31 / 3.41*KMTA
3.45 / 3.84
KMTB
3.45 / 3.84
3.45 / 3.84KMTD
3.41 / 3.77
34
Approx. 9.2-9.5 kW
3.29 / 3.30*KMTA
3.38 / 3.63
KMTB
3.38 / 3.63
3.38 / 3.63KMTD
3.49 / 3.39

* Historical LVCC 24/30/34 EER and COP values are calculated from the published rated capacity and rated input-power figures for those systems.

What Does the Comparison Show?

09 and 12 capacity

The early KMCA/KMCB models were already highly efficient at their rated operating point. The later KMTC remains highly efficient, although its individual EER or COP figure is not necessarily higher in every mode.

18 and 22 capacity

These capacities show one of the clearest efficiency improvements over the earlier LVCC Classic models. The KMTC/KMTD 18 model increases rated cooling EER from approximately 3.27 to 4.31 and heating COP from approximately 4.03 to 4.69.

24 capacity

The KMTC/KMTD generation provides a particularly strong improvement in rated heating efficiency compared with the older LVCC model. The KMTE is a different system configuration and should not be assumed to have the same EER/COP as the KMTD simply because it is a later suffix.

30 and 34 capacity

Changes between generations are smaller and are not always in the same direction for cooling and heating. For example, the newer 34 KMTD has a higher rated cooling EER than the KMTC, but a lower rated heating COP.

KMCA versus KMCB:

From an EER/COP perspective, the equivalent KMCA/KMTA and KMCB/KMTB models are essentially the same. The KMCB generation should therefore not be described as an efficiency upgrade purely on the basis of the model suffix. Its major product changes included additional connectivity and control features.

Zoned Energy Rating Labels

Current non-ducted split systems use a Zoned Energy Rating Label. Unlike the older single cooling/heating star-rating system, the current label provides separate seasonal efficiency ratings for:

  • Hot climate
  • Average climate
  • Cold climate

The seasonal rating considers performance across a range of outdoor temperatures rather than only the rated EER/COP test condition.

When answering a customer: If they are comparing the running cost of two current systems, use the Zoned Energy Rating Label for their climate zone and compare systems of a similar capacity. If they are comparing an older model with a newer replacement, EER and COP can be used as a useful technical comparison, but they do not by themselves predict annual electricity consumption.

Example - Replacing an ASTG18LVCC

ModelCooling CapacityEERHeating CapacityCOP
ASTG18LVCC5.0 kW3.276.0 kW4.03
ASTG18KMTC / ASTH18KMTD5.0 kW4.316.0 kW4.69

In this example the rated capacity remains approximately the same, but substantially less electrical input is required at the rated test condition to produce each kW of cooling or heating.

Important Comparison Notes

  • Compare matched indoor and outdoor units, not the indoor model alone.
  • Compare systems with a similar rated capacity.
  • EER and COP represent rated operating conditions, not every operating condition.
  • Inverter systems vary compressor speed and electrical input during normal operation.
  • Actual energy consumption depends on room load, insulation, temperature setting, climate, installation quality and operating time.
  • Do not directly compare an old star rating with a current Zoned Energy Rating Label.
  • For current products, use the Hot, Average or Cold climate rating applicable to the installation location.
Technical Information Disclaimer

The information in this article is intended as a technical comparison reference. Specifications may vary by market, production revision and matched outdoor unit. Always confirm the complete indoor and outdoor model numbers and refer to the applicable product specification before providing a definitive efficiency or running-cost comparison.

Energy efficiency figures do not provide a guaranteed electricity consumption or running cost. Actual consumption will vary according to installation conditions, climate, building heat load, user settings and operating patterns.
Search terms:
ASTG09LVCC, ASTG12LVCC, ASTG18LVCC, ASTG22LVCC, ASTG24LVCC, ASTG30LVCC, ASTG34LVCC, ASTG09KMCA, ASTG12KMCA, ASTG18KMCA, ASTG22KMCA, ASTG24KMCA, ASTG30KMTA, ASTG34KMTA, ASTG09KMCB, ASTG12KMCB, ASTG18KMCB, ASTG22KMCB, ASTG24KMCB, ASTG30KMTB, ASTG34KMTB, ASTG09KMTC, ASTG12KMTC, ASTG18KMTC, ASTG22KMTC, ASTG24KMTC, ASTG30KMTC, ASTG34KMTC, ASTH18KMTD, ASTH22KMTD, ASTH24KMTD, ASTH30KMTD, ASTH34KMTD, ASTH24KMTE, EER, COP, energy efficiency, star rating, zoned energy rating, high wall split, Lifestyle, Classic, running cost, replacement air conditioner.